In the previous post I wrote about why psychologists should
be doing research. That post was particularly aimed at students so that they
learn the proper way to be professional psychologists. This post is about where
to publish research, and so may be of more interest to already qualified
psychologists who are planning investigations, or are already doing it.
The issue of where to publish is an important consideration.
Research that is never published is likely to be of very limited impact.
Research that is published could be influencing practice not just in Ecuador,
but globally, for many years. So research should be published. And by
publishing I am mainly talking here of journal articles. Working with other media
is OK, but it has to be carefully managed, and undertaken responsibly.
Newspapers and magazines are about entertainment not truth, and journalists don’t
care whether the person they are quoting is an expert on not, they just want a ‘Dr’
to say something interesting. I know, I’ve been there. Whether or not you work
with the popular media, that can’t be all you do. The fact is that to be
considered internationally relevant as a psychologist you have to be producing
data-based journal articles.
It is best to think of where your research may be published
very early in the research process. You can then tailor the research to the
outlet. For example, the Journal of Adolescence has a special section for
research from developing countries, these are very brief reports of up to 1000
words. Knowing that, Ecuadorian researchers could plan their investigation to
nicely fit the requirement of the journal, thus maximizing the chance that the
research will eventually be published. And if the research is already complete,
you still need to find a very appropriate journal for it. You’ll waste
everybody’s time by sending manuscripts to inappropriate journals.
In general, it is also good to think about the international
outlook of the journal. Some journals are, shamefully, very euro- or
gringo-centric and prefer not to publish work from countries such as Ecuador.
On the other hand, some journals are proudly international. Obviously, being
Ecuador-based, we will have better chances of success if we submit to journals
that specifically describe themselves as being internationally focused, or at
least have a history of publishing work from around the world.
Nowadays we don’t need to worry much about the impact
factors of the journals. This is because the impact factor is an old metric
that just tells you how successful, on average, papers in a journal have been
in the past. The most basic calculation is the number of citations to the
published works each year divided by the number of papers published each year.
For example, on average, any paper in a journal with an impact factor of 3 will
be cited about 3 times per year. However, these days we have article-level
metrics, it is now more important that your work actually gets cited,
regardless of the average success of the journal. Getting your work cited is
the number one issue.
To do this you should try and publish in journals which are
widely indexed. for example, if you publish in a journal that is indexed in
Medline, PsychINFO and Scopus, it will be very accessible by other people. This
will maximize the chances that your research becomes popular, is cited, and
doesn’t just disappear. For researchers in Ecuador, publishing in journals that
are at least indexed in Scopus is important, as this criterion is used across
the country to define ‘good’ research. If you want to impress your bosses, the
work must be in a Scopus-indexed journal. Good journals will list the databases
that they are indexed in on their websites. And you can check some of the main
database journal lists, you can download the lists of journals indexed in
Scopus and in PsychINFO.
So ignore the impact factors and just aim to publish in a journal which is well-indexed.
The other main issue to consider is whether your research
will be locked behind a paywall. It may surprise some people, but the authors
of journal articles never receive any payment for their writing. The fees
charged are profits for the publishing companies. In fact, some journals now
charge the authors a fee to publish, and this can be as much as $3000. These
pay-to-publish journals then give away the research as free PDF downloads. So although
it’s very expensive, it will help your research to get cited if it is freely
distributed in this way. This method of charging the authors for the costs, not
the consumers, is better for people in less-developed countries who want to
access research information, as they get free access to science. Anybody with
computer access can get it.
However, for the researchers in less-developed countries,
such as Ecuador, this model can be a problem. In the rich countries researchers
often have large research grants, and they budget in advance for these publication
costs. Then their research benefits from being open-access. In Ecuador such
large grants are rare so there is usually no money available to pay the
publication fees. The publishing companies are somewhat sympathetic to this,
and will often waive the fees for researchers based in low-income countries.
However, Ecuador is considered upper-middle income, so waivers are not
available. Nevertheless, if you can find ways to publish in open-access
journals, this will help to get your research used and cited.
But be careful about which pay-to-publish journal you submit
to. Since this publishing model began, many fake journals have appeared. They
look (somewhat) like real academic journals but have very low or no publication
standards, they exist mainly to take fees and care nothing about quality. These
are called predatory journals, they exploit the vane and the naive, and they distort
science. They get business by spam emailing people and requesting manuscripts
quickly. Sometimes they don’t even read the material before publishing it. Take
the example shown below, an article accepted by the International Journal of
Advanced Computer Technology. The article consists of these words repeated over
and over “Get me off your fucking mailing list”.
This paper was accepted by a predatory journal. Also shown is one of the figures from the paper. Avoid predatory journals at all costs. If in doubt Google the journal name with the word 'predatory'. |
Not all pay journals are predatory, in fact some of the best
journals either use this economic model solely are partially. It is now an
essential skill that psychologist be able to distinguish the real from the predatory
journals, and the best universities are now incorporating this training into
their degrees.
Other than predatory journals, there are other places you shouldn’t
be considering. As I said above, the primary route for psychological research
publication is academic journals, not newspapers, magazines etc. Books are of
course useful, and may be essential to have on your resume if you want to gain
tenure in the USA. If you do want to publish a book, it must be with a
reputable academic publisher. These are often associated with universities. Don’t
be tempted into vanity publishing. Anybody can publish a book with a vanity
publisher. They take a fee and they publish your book. There is nothing
particularly wrong with that. Lots of very niche works are published in this
way, autobiographies of people who are not at all famous, guides to restoring mid-twentieth-century
rocking chairs etc. But it is not appropriate for academic work. If you do
vanity publish academic work It might impress your friends and naive colleagues.
But well-educated and reputable psychologists will not be fooled, and will see
it as a form of charlatanism. It’s better to have no books on your academic resume
than vanity published books. The problem is that vanity publishing doesn’t
really need any peer reviewing. It is this peer-review process which maintains
standards.
That is why journal articles, whether pay-to-publish or not,
are considered so highly. They are very selective, if the research is not good,
or not well analysed, or not well written, it will be rejected. The peer reviews
will be done be anonymous experts, and these are generally very strict and very
critical. But it is this quality control that makes them generally trustworthy,
considerably more trustworthy than journalism. They form the basis of evidence-based
practice. Which is what all psychologists should be striving for.
Which leads me to my final point. Getting published in
academic journals is very difficult, the work must be very well produced, and
even then you can expect rejections. The best scientists in the world receive
lots of rejections. You just have to persevere. But the good news is that every
time it gets a little easier. Though it never gets easy. Do it.