Psychology in Suriname

Paramaribo, the capital city of Suriname, has hosted an international psychology conference this week. It has been focused on Caribbean issues, but to some extent this also includes Latin American issues. Although interestingly, Suriname is one of the few places that is in South America, but not Latin America, being mainly Dutch speaking. Although most delegates were from Suriname or Caribbean islands, there were a few international visitors from Europe, the USA, Asia, and me from Ecuador. In fact this was the first presentation credited to the newly formed Quito Brain and Behavior Lab.

The Caribbean Psychology Conference, opening ceremony being blessed by an Amerindian shaman.

I was presenting some of my work on neuropsychological function of 'street children', this is an issue relevant to several Caribbean nations. I've presented my data on PTSD previously (and also it's just been published), but this was the first presentation of the neuropsychological data. It was generally well received with a packed room of 40 delegates to hear my presentation. Although mine was one of only two or three neuropsychological presentations, indeed it was of only a handful that included data, the majority being mainly rhetoric driven. Nevertheless, I met some people doing interesting work and making such connections is the most important aspect of academic conferencing.

The Binaural Beats Project

Binaural beats are a curious phenomenon. If you listen to two tones through earphones, one to each ear, you can create a detectable pulsing sound. The pulse, or beat, is at the same frequency as the difference between the two tones. So for example a 400 hertz tone to the left ear combined with a 410 hertz tone to the right ear, produces a psychological beat sound at 10 hertz (i.e. pulsing 10 times each second). Therefore this beat doesn’t exist in either tone, and it’s not being heard by either ear. In fact it doesn’t exist in the real world, just in your perception. Furthermore, these beats can be detected in brain signals, they have been recorded in the cat inferior colliculus, amongst other brain areas, by single cell recordings, and in the human brain by electroecephalography (EEG). In fact, binaural beats have the potential to entrain brain waves, artificially altering the frequency of electrical brain activity.

These binaural beats have been known about for many years, however, recently the internet has made the audio tracks easily available. With a computer and earphones, anybody can listen to them via YouTube. And lots of people are, under the belief that you can improve concentration, learning, relaxation etc. The tabloid media have taken the opportunity to make a moral panic out of it, renaming it ‘i-dosing’, complete with horror stories of people over-i-dosing. In fact there is little evidence for the induction of psychological states with binaural beats, and the greatest danger may simply be of hearing damage if they are listened too at high volume.

The media´s typical ridiculous response to binaural beats

Nevertheless, in theory, if brain waves can be entrained, this would be a very useful tool in psychology and neuroscience. So research on this topic is needed. Together with a biophysics student from Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo in Riobamba, we have been testing out the potential of theta frequency binaural beats on cognitive function and emotional state. The experiment involves participants listening to electronic music for 15 minutes, and then performing a range of cognitive tasks designed to measure creativity and initiation. In addition their emotional states are recorded. In one condition there is a theta frequency binaural beat embedded in the music, in the other condition a very similar pair of sinusoidal waves that do not produce a binaural beat.

Data collection at Universidad San Francisco de Quito. Marco Lopez performs cognitive tests while the participant listens to the binaural beats. 

This research is ongoing. We’ll report what we find in a future blog post. 

The Scientist Practitioner Model

I'm not the only psychologist here at Universidad San Francisco de Quito, but I'm probably the only scientist-psychologist. There is a tendency here to focus heavily on therapy, which is fine. I´m sure good therapists do good work. My concern is that psychology has to be empirically based. A solid factual basis is needed so that what works is applied to clinical practice and what is merely psycho-babble is rightly kept out of the clinic. This is why all psychologists need to be trained as both scientists and practitioners.

This isn't anything new, the scientist-practitioner model in clinical psychology training has been highly influential in Europe and North America for decades. The basis of it is simply that any psychological practitioner must also be a capable scientist. There are many benefits to such an approach.

Firstly, psychologists who research keep themselves at the vanguard of the discipline. A professional career in psychology can last more than 40 years. Forty plus years of change and development. A psychologist who rests on their laurels will ultimately become an anachronism.

Secondly, psychologists need to be able to judge if their own practice is effective. Scientific training equips practitioners with a nuanced understanding of expectations, spontaneous recovery, placebo and nocebo effects. The history of medicine is replete with cases of ineffective, or even harmful treatments being continued because doctors lacked the clarity of observation to see what was really happening (think leaches, blood letting etc.).

Thirdly, even if psychologists don´t research or audit their own performance, they need to be evidence-based. Without real evidence to support practice, psychologists risk becoming merely psychological quacks, with their own versions of blood-letting and leaches. Being evidence based means being able to understand empirical research. Research published in reputable peer-reviewed journals. This means understanding research methodology, understanding statistics, and being information literate. An excellent book on this topic, written for medical doctors, but still relevant to psychologists is ´How to Read a Paper´ written by Trisha Greenhalgh (free PDF version here).

In fact, the list could go on and on. The scientist-practitioner model is a no-brainer.

Consequently I am trying to inject as much science as I can into the training of psychologists here in Ecuador. The irony of it all is that I am not a scientist practitioner myself. This is because I am an academic psychologist. I've never treated a patient, my training is all in research. A bachelors degree, PhD and several postdoctoral research positions. Nevertheless, my research has always been in clinical fields, mainly psychiatry and neurology.

As a first step I have introduced research projects as a key part of the assessment all of my courses. Again this has multiple benefits, researched projects have a significant validity that promotes deep learning, and simultaneously students are learning academic research skills. To facilitate this I have produced a detailed guide to writing psychology lab reports. This can be downloaded here.

But it's more than just lab reports. The internet revolution has thrown up more misinformation than information, people all over the world are being bombarded with nonsense dressed as fact. Students too often lack the skills to separate the wheat from the chaff, the nonsense from the fact. As scientist-practitioners we need to primarily rely on material published in peer reviewed journals, and this is something that I´m also emphasizing across my courses.  This skill is often called ´information literacy´. That can be a topic for a future blog post. 

UK, Ecuador, Japan then Ecuador again

This blog is about the psychology work I’m involved with here in Ecuador. It’s a not a comprehensive review of psychology in the country. Although I hope it will provide some exposure to what’s going on here and help to promote Ecuadorian psychology in general. My other motive is to promote interaction with psychologists and researchers, those here in Ecuador or in other countries.   

I’m British, what am I doing in Ecuador? Well back in 2008 I was research fellow at the University of Sheffield in the UK. In that year my supervisor had just left to return to the USA, so there was a potential opening for a tenured position. In fact, it had my name on it. Unfortunately, at about the same time, the world financial markets started to crash, the University decided it was time to cut-back on expenditure. No job for me.

I decided to try a new strategy: Move to Ecuador. At first I taught English as it’s the easiest work to find as foreigner. Pretty soon I had a couple of courses of psychology teaching and some academic writing classes at Universidad San Francisco de Quito, reputed the best university in the country. Two years of that and I had a new plan. Move to Japan and teach there instead.

Japan is a great country, unfortunately its university system is awful. I taught at Chuo University in Tokyo for two years and even managed, despite the University, to do some research. In the meantime, my former University in Ecuador offered me a professorship. So I’m back in Quito. Ecuador is a great country, and I’m teaching at a university that values research. In fact, I've got several research projects moving since my return, 3 months ago. If you have any research ideas, or you have any questions, get in touch.